From 384bebe3d07329b33c3d5b0628da17d41103f66d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Giovanni <561184+wargio@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 15:49:04 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Make AI guidelines more visually noticeable (#5727)

---
 CONTRIBUTING.md | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index 8b964d858f..19d92d5723 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -110,17 +110,19 @@ rules to make the git history more readable and consistent:
 Following the widespread availability of large language models and generative AI,
 Rizin Organization has received a growing number of changes generated partially or
 entirely using such tools. Many of these are completely unusable in our codebase.
-While AI tools can help to draft changes, they must not replace human understanding
-and proper code modifications.
 
-If you use AI tools to help prepare a code change, you must:
-
-- **Disclose** which AI tools were used and specify what they were used for.
-- **Verify** that the code compiles, works and is not copyrighted by somebody else.
-- **Avoid** fabricated code, placeholder text, or references to non-existent code.
-
-Changes that appear to be unverified AI output will be closed without response.
-Repeated low-quality submissions may result in a ban.
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+> While AI tools can help to draft changes, **they must NOT replace human understanding
+> and proper code modifications**.
+>
+> If you use AI tools to help prepare a code change, you must:
+>
+> - **Disclose** which AI tools were used and specify what they were used for.
+> - **Verify** that the code compiles, works and is not copyrighted by somebody else.
+> - **Avoid** fabricated code, placeholder text, or references to non-existent code.
+>
+> Changes that appear to be unverified AI output will be closed without response.
+> Repeated low-quality submissions may result in a ban.
 
 We align with similar policies adopted by other major open-source projects, which have
 described the flood of unverified AI-generated code changes as disruptive, counterproductive,