rust-sdk/crates
Greg Virgin 4b82e41522
docs(server): document Err vs Ok(CallToolResult::error) visibility contract on ServerHandler::call_tool (#854)
* docs(server): document Err vs Ok(CallToolResult::error) visibility contract

The MCP spec separates two failure modes that surface very differently in
clients:

  - Err(ErrorData) is a JSON-RPC protocol error. Most MCP clients render
    it opaquely ("Tool result missing due to internal error") - the
    caller does not see the message text.
  - Ok(CallToolResult::error(content)) is a tool-level error. Clients
    render the content; the caller reads the message.

The right shape for "the tool didn't work" is the latter, but Err is
what most handlers reach for because it looks like the natural Rust
return value. This commit adds rustdoc on both ServerHandler::call_tool
and CallToolResult::error pointing handlers at the correct shape, with
a worked example showing protocol errors (-32602 invalid_params) vs
tool errors (empty result, downstream failure).

This is the docs half of the visibility-contract ask. A follow-up may
introduce a typed ToolOutcome sum type to enforce the distinction at
compile time; this PR is the lower-risk version that unblocks the
class immediately.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: update crates/rmcp/src/handler/server.rs

* docs: update crates/rmcp/src/model.rs

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Dale Seo <5466341+DaleSeo@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-16 22:13:33 -04:00
..
rmcp docs(server): document Err vs Ok(CallToolResult::error) visibility contract on ServerHandler::call_tool (#854) 2026-06-16 22:13:33 -04:00
rmcp-macros fix: strip and validate tool outputSchema and inputSchema (#860) 2026-06-02 12:01:33 -04:00